Monday, August 6, 2012
Reduction In Lead Act Public Meeting
The Act amends Section 1417 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) to prohibit the use of certain plumbing products that are not “lead free” (as defined by SDWA), and bans the introduction of products that are not “lead free.” The revision to the SDWA changed the definition of "lead-free" to a lead content with weighted average of not more than 0.25% in the wetted surface material. In addition, the Act added a specific formula for calculating lead content. Finally, the Act created two separate exemptions to the prohibitions on the use and introduction into commerce of products that are not “lead free.”
Some changes to the Act raised implementation challenges and issues that may warrant further regulatory changes. EPA says it would make any needed regulatory changes as part of the Lead and Copper Rule long-term revisions. Because the final Lead and Copper Rule revisions will be published after the effective date of SDWA revisions, the Agency intends to provide information to assist plumbing manufacturers, states, water systems, plumbing retailers, and other parties in complying with the provisions of the Act starting in 2014. Information in the public meeting will help inform these stakeholders on the regulatory revisions that will affect them. Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Texas to obtain environmental permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to prepare compliance programs, including SWPPP Plans, SPCC Plans prepared to meet TCEQ requirements.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at info@calthacompany.comor Caltha LLP Website
Thursday, November 10, 2011
EPA Action On Texas Regional Haze SIP
The dates for promulgation of final rules (either accepting or rejecting State plans) begin December 13, 2011 and run through November 15, 2011. The dates for action on the Texas regional haze SIP are:
Proposed Promulgation: May 15, 2012
Final Promulgation: November 15, 2012
EPA initially issued a rule in 1999 requiring states to submit regional haze plans. These plans were due in December 2007, but no action was taken by the agency in response to the submittals. National Parks Conservation Association and other environmental groups sued the agency in August 2011 to take action on these plans, and the consent decree resolves this litigation. EPA will accept public comment on this agreement for 30 days following publication of a notice in the Federal Register.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Texas to obtain environmental permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to prepare compliance programs, including SWPPP Plans, SPCC Plans prepared to meet TCEQ requirements. For further information contact Caltha LLP at
Friday, July 29, 2011
New Air Emission Rules Affecting Texas Oil and Gas Drilling
EPA’s analysis of the proposed changes, which also include requirements for storage tanks and other equipment, estimates a net savings to the industry of $10s of millions annually from the value of natural gas that would no longer escape to the air. The proposal includes reviews of four air regulations for the oil and natural gas industry as required by the Clean Air Act: a new source performance standard for VOCs from equipment leaks at gas processing plants; a new source performance standard for sulfur dioxide emissions from gas processing plants; an air toxics standard for oil and natural gas production; and an air toxics standard for natural gas transmission and storage.
EPA is under a consent decree requiring the agency to sign a proposal by July 28, 2011 and take final action by Feb. 28, 2012. As part of the public comment period, EPA will hold three public hearings, in the Dallas, Denver and Pittsburgh areas.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Texas to obtain environmental permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to prepare compliance programs, including SWPPP Plans, SPCC Plans prepared to meet TCEQ requirements. For further information contact Caltha LLP at
Friday, June 24, 2011
Two Texas Counties Selected For Hydraulic Fracturing Study
The studies will take place in several regions across the country, and are broken into two study groups. Two of the seven sites were selected as prospective case studies where EPA will monitor key aspects of the hydraulic fracturing process throughout the lifecycle of a well.
These areas are located in:
Haynesville Shale - DeSoto Parish, LA
Marcellus Shale - Washington County, PA
Five retrospective case studies were selected and will examine areas where hydraulic fracturing has already occurred for any impact on drinking water resources. These are located in:
Bakken Shale - Kildeer, and Dunn Counties, ND
Barnett Shale - Wise and Denton Counties, TX
Marcellus Shale - Bradford and Susquehanna Counties, PA.
Marcellus Shale - Washington County, PA
Raton Basin - Las Animas County, CO
The information gathered from these case studies will include literature review, collection of data and information from states, industry and communities, laboratory work and computer modeling.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Texas to obtain environmental permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to prepare compliance programs, including SWPPP Plans, SPCC Plans prepared to meet TCEQ requirements.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP WebsiteFriday, April 15, 2011
Draft Construction Permit Released For Public Comment
Some of the significant proposed permit modifications include new requirements for:
- Eligibility for emergency-related construction
- Required use of the electronic notice of intent (NOI)process
- Sediment and erosion controls
- Natural buffers or alternative controls
- Soil stabilization
- Pollution prevention
- Site inspections
- Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP)
- Permit termination (NOT)
Many of the new permit requirements implement new effluent limitations guidelines and new source performance standards for the construction and development industry that became effective on February 1, 2010. These requirements include a number of erosion and sediment controls and pollution prevention measures that apply to all permitted construction sites.
The permit will be effective in areas where EPA is the permitting authority, including four states (Idaho, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and New Mexico); Washington, D.C.; most territories; and most Indian country lands. However, in practice, EPA general permits are used by authorized States as a template for revised State general NPDES permits, and therefore, conditions of the EPA permit will likely be reflected in State permits in the future.
The public will have 60 days to comment on the draft permit. EPA anticipates that it will issue the final construction general permit by January 31, 2012.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Texas to obtain environmental permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to prepare compliance programs, including SWPPP Plans, SPCC Plans prepared to meet TCEQ requirements.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.comor Caltha LLP WebsiteTuesday, April 12, 2011
Spill Prevention Rule 40 CFR 112 Excludes Milk
The final exemption applies to milk, milk product containers, and milk production equipment. In addition, because some of these facilities may still have oil storage subject to the spill prevention regulations, EPA is also amending the rule to exclude milk storage capacity from a facility’s total oil storage capacity calculation. The agency is also removing the compliance date requirements for the exempted containers.
The SPCC regulations require facilities with the capacity to store more than the threshold quantity of oils and fats to create and implement plans to prepare, prevent and respond to spills. The current exemption for milk does not apply to fuel oil and other applicable oils stored on farms; farms that store above the regulatory threshold of fuel oil and other applicable oils are covered under the SPCC.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Texas to obtain environmental permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to prepare compliance programs, including SWPPP Plans, SPCC Plans prepared to meet TCEQ requirements.
For further information contact Caltha LLP at
info@calthacompany.com or Caltha LLP WebsiteWednesday, March 23, 2011
Proposed TCEQ Industrial Stormwater Discharge Permit
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is proposing to renew TPDES Multi Sector General Permit (MSGP). The draft MSGP specifies which facilities must obtain permit coverage, which are eligible for exclusion from permit requirements (NEC), which may be automatically authorized, and which may be required to obtain individual permit coverage.
Some of the key changes to the existing MSGP include:
- Added a section to the general permit stating that certain types facilities are covered under the general permit without submitting an NOI, nor having to implement a SWP3 according to the requirements of the general permit, provided that certain specific permit conditions are met
- A new option for transportation facilities (land transportation and warehousing, water transportation, and air transportation) to include storm water discharges from material handling and storage areas in their MSGP authorization.
- Authorization for contaminated storm water discharges from active landfill cells described by industrial activity codes HZ (hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal) and LF (landfills and land application sites) that are subject to 40 CFR Part 445, Subparts A and B.
- Changes to requirements for paper application forms, and increased the application fee by $100.00 for operators submitting a paper NOI or NEC form.
- Changes to benchmark sampling, including:
1. Revised benchmark levels based on data that was submitted during calendar years 2007 and 2008.
2. Added benchmark sampling requirements in Sector AD (Miscellaneous Industrial Activities) for pollutants commonly regulated in individual storm water permits: pH, COD, TSS, and oil and grease.
3. Added a waiver option for benchmark sampling during Years 3 and 4, if sampling during Years 1 and 2 demonstrates that the annual average result for all benchmark parameters is below the benchmark level for the regulated sector.
4. Revised reporting requirements so that Years 1 and 2 data would be submitted to TCEQ and Years 3 and 4, if collected, would be retained on site, except that any annual average result exceeding a benchmark level must be submitted to the TCEQ. - Revision of permit language regarding “representative storm event” changed to “qualifying storm event,” to clarify that a precipitation event is considered representative (or qualifying) based on the fact that it produces a discharge, rather than based on the measured amount of precipitation (i.e., previously, a representative storm event would include at least 0.1 inch of measured precipitation).
- Additional revisions within several specific industries in Part V of the draft MSGP, including:
1. Removed effluent limits for runoff from coal piles that are not associated with a steam electric power generating facility.
2. Added or revised industry-specific requirements for most industrial sectors to be consistent with EPA’s 2008 MSGP. - Revised the section “Impaired Water Bodies and Total Maximum Daily Load Requirements” to address new and existing discharges to impaired water bodies.
Caltha LLP provides expert environmental consultant services in Texas to obtain environmental permits, evaluate regulatory requirements, and to prepare compliance programs, including SWPPP Plans, SPCC Plans prepared to meet TCEQ requirements. For further information contact Caltha LLP at